Below we ranked some of the new technologies and innovations that have hit the running shoe market in the last couple of years. Find out how we ranked tech trends such as the featherweight race foam in the ASICS Metaspeed Ray, the Air Zoom units in the Nike Vomero Premium, lightspray uppers such as in the On Cloudboom Strike LS, the CloudTec air units in the On Cloudmonster Hyper, and more.


We ranked some of the biggest running shoe tech trends from S-tier game changers to F-tier misses based on real-world performance, value, and innovation. From race-day foams and featherlight builds at the top to overpriced gimmicks and questionable tech at the bottom, this list is all about separating innovation from noise. Not every flashy feature earns its keep once the miles stack up.

Many thought this would be a gimmick, but Nike’s latest recovery tech delivers genuine performance.

The search for the lightest viable marathon shoe is the new frontier of race day innovation, and shoes like the Metaspeed Ray are leading the charge.

With its track-spike inspired geometry, the Streakfly 2 was one of the fastest (and most innovative) shoes of the year.
.png)
Many of 2025’s top shoes, including the Megablast, EVO SL and Vomero Plus, all used race-caliber foam without a plate to great success. This formula is here to stay.


ASICS successfully shook up the dual foam format by placing softer & bouncier foam (FF Leap) on the bottom with a firmer, more aggressive foam (FF Turbo+) up top in the Sky Tokyo’s midsole.

Shoes like the Puma Velocity Nitro 4 perfectly blend modern and classic running shoe tech, providing a flexible ride and plenty of ground feel without sacrificing protection and bounce.

We’re not ready to join barefoot mafia, but there’s something to be said for a wide, accommodating toebox (when combined with a modern running shoe midsole, such as in the TYR Maverick-V1 Runner).
%207.png)
On’s Lightspray tech found in the Cloudboom Strike LS is very impressive from an engineering standpoint (and it’s runnable,) but most people are better off with a standard upper.

We see no problem with upmarket, niche shoes—so long as the performance is reasonably on par with broader market standards (like the Tracksmith Eliot Racer).
.png)
The Midfoot Support System in the Nike Structure Plus provides excellent stability, but it’s likely too intrusive for the average runner. If you don’t like a chunky heel, stay far, far away.

It feels like Adidas uses “Strung” uppers in the Prime X line just for the sake of it. Sure, it looks cool, but a normal upper would do the job just fine.

While we applaud Speedland for their innovative removable plate design, the plateless configuration of the RX:FPY was way better. With the plate, the shoe turns into a heavy, less bouncy, sub-par racer.

We could stomach the idea of a $500 race shoe if it were to provide a ride unlike anything else. The problem is that the Pro Evo 2 is too unremarkable to be $200 more expensive than shoes like the Puma Fast-R 3.

Holes in a midsole don’t do much if the foam itself is ultra firm. We’d love to see On experiment with CloudTec and modern compounds.
.png)
So far, this genre of race shoe has failed to justify its own existence. Why pay $230 for the heavy and lifeless Cloudboom Max, when the $200 Superblast 2 offers all the protection, stability and bounce needed for long time on feet?

The Air Zoom unit in the Pegasus 41 feels more like a marketing ploy than a genuine addition to the midsole.
For great deals on gently used or brand new running shoes, sign up for the Supwell app. You'll get DAILY motivation, the most supportive hobby jogger community, best buy, sell and trade shoe marketplace and exclusive Hobby Jogger gear discounts, including access to the Running Warehouse code that will get you 20% off of clearance shoes.

Answer a few questions to find the best shoe based on your preferences and goals



